Yes, you’ve already recapped Astrocast with Lambo and I and I don’t see it being a problem if you also recap this show, I think it will good for publicity, so GO FOR IT!

Now to counter my first point, haha! I know if you leave it simply as I stated above, then every cultist, wack-job will ask for protect of their consideration of marriage under the law. That goes your point of redefining marriage from the traditional man-woman to man-man, man-another-subspecies, and of course polygamy.

Maybe it’s not as simple and so, let’s compromise, a generalization via a constitutional amendment, “Marriage: union of two contenting adults” the rest is left up to the religious beliefs of the individuals. This limits marriage to monogamy, and takes care other wacky definition but has enough freedom to allow for gays to marry.

A few comments on your first show:
Something that no one has pointed out concerning religious objections to gay marriage is that many churches, including the Catholic church, do not recognize some legal marriages today. It is my understanding that a divorced person cannot remarry in the eyes of the Catholic church. Other, more strict religious institutions do not recognize marriages for members to someone outside of their own faith. Yet no one would suggest that these second marriages are not legitimate in a civil sense because of religious objections.

Also not addressed was the frequent argument that if marriage is redefined from the traditional “one man and one woman”, then what would be next? Animals, more than 2 people, etc. While most people realize that the whole marrying your goat argument is ridiculous, there are people such as the cult members in Texas that engage in polygamy right now. What would changing marriage laws do for stopping polygamy. Or, should polygamy even be stopped?